Part 4: Hiram Fee

A tutorial on deductive reason when branching your family tree using Hiram Fee as the example.

If you happened upon this blog, recommend you read Part 1, Part 2, and/or Part 3. Having performed the prior steps, it’s time to move on to Step #6.

STEP #6:  APPLY THE HARD PROBABILITIES TO YOUR POSSIBILITIES.

At this point, there may be no “smoking gun” that outright gives you the information you’re looking for. This is where you really need to dig into the collected records and go back through Step #1 thru Step #5… again. This is where you need to examine everything on a record. This is where we may need to correlate a lot of circumstantial evidence.

By now, we have to question if the obituary of Hiram “Pappy” Fee, Jr. is for the son of Hiram Jones Fee?

Obituary of Hiram “Pappy” Fee, Jr
The Courier-Journal, IN (25 Dec 1997), p.9

No death certificate could be found. No marriage record indicating spouse or parents could be found.

First, we analyze the information in his siblings’ obituaries. That gives us location. Next, we search the city directories of those locations. That gives us possible spouses and occupation. Going back and following Step #1 thru Step #5, we find the 1997 obituary correlates location and occupation. Further research shows that Hiram Jr.’s children listed in the obituary have a mother named Colleen Flannery. Applying Step #5, when placed in chronological order, the collected records suggest that all of them pertain to one person.

  • 1953:  Jeffersonville City Directory with wife Colleen and occupation as “A&P Bakery (Lou[isville]).”
  • 1955:  Jeffersonville City Directory with wife Colleen and occupation as “mixer A&P (Lou[isville]).”
  • 1970:  James Fee’s obituary states “[brother] Hiram Fee, Jr. of Jeffersonville…”
  • 1971:  Granville Fee’s obituary states “[brother] Hiram Fee, Jr., of Jeffersonville…”
  • 1973:  Garrett Fee’s obituary states “[brother] Hiram Fee, Jr., of Jeffersonville…”
  • 1981:  Paul Fee’s obituary states “[brother] Hiram Jr. of Jeffersonville…”
  • 1984:  Arta Farmer’s obituary states “[brother] Hiram Fee of Clarksville.”
  • 1997:  Obituary for Hiram “Pappy” Fee, Jr., 74, [of Clarksville] died Wednesday [24 December 1997] at Audobon Hospital [Louisville]… a native of Harlan County, Ky., a retired baker for A&P bakeries in Louisville… with burial in Jeffersonville…” The obituary also lists surviving siblings, but neither of them are the children of Louisa Hensley or of Sallie Farmer.

Yet we still have not proven that he is the son of our Hiram Sr. There is still a high probability that there are two Hiram Jr’s in the Clarksville area.

From the obituary, we can deduce that Hiram Jr. was born in or around 1923 and that he was formerly of Harlan County. A records search brings up a 1940 federal census of Knox County in which “H.J. Fee, age 16 (born about 1924), stepson” is living with a “Lee Fee, age 19, stepson” in the household of Lewis Hensley. Hensley’s wife is “Susie” with an additional step daughter, Flora Eversole, age 21.

Sixteenth Census of the United States: 1940, Kentucky, Knox County, Magisterial District #5, Supervisor’s District #9, Enumeration District #61 & 62, Sheet #3A, Line #21-31 (06 April 1940).

Going back through the steps, we find a birth date of 21 January 1923 and “Susan Hensley” as the mother of Hiram Jr. The death date on his tombstone is 24 December 1997 that matches the obituary date. But we still haven’t correlated Hiram Jr. with Hiram Jones Fee.

Going back through the steps, we find a record with a birth date of 12 January 1923 and “Susan Fee” for Lee Clellan Fee. His tombstone is inscribed with a death date of “…son of Mrs. Louis Hensley…” All this information matches the 1940 federal census, but again, we still haven’t correlated Hiram or Lee with Hiram Jones Fee.

It’s a small article on page nine of the Jackson County Banner (21 August 1957) that states “Mr. and Mrs. Lawrence Fee and Mr. and Mrs. Garrett Fee were called to Cincinnati Tuesday by the death of Mr. Fee’s brother, Lee Fee.”

Jackson County Banner, IN ( 21 August 1957), p.9

With all of this information, as well as the records for E.B. Hensley, Bruce Hensley, Keith Hensley, Norma Stopher, and Irene Williams, we can conclude with higher probability that Hiram Jones Fee and Susan Alice Reed had sons Hiram Fee and Lee Clellan Fee.

However, we’re still back to the 1880 federal census with Hiram Jones Fee enumerated as the son of Henderson Fee and Sarah Osborne which conflicts with the death certificate stating that Hiram Fee and Rebecca Jones are his parents.

Death Certificate of Hiram Jones Fee (1875-1950)

STEP #7:  TAKE A LEAP OF FAITH.

With extremely limited information, yet armed with your knowledge of family history, local history, social customs, and personal experiences, start asking “what if…?”

In a time where large families were needed to work the farm, where are the other children of Henderson and Sarah? Is there any evidence other than an 1880 federal census that Hiram is Henderson and Sarah’s son? Again, “no data is data…”

It’s the 1910 United States Federal Census that has the most interest. Henderson and Sarah now have a household that includes Louise Hensley and Granville, Artie, Finley, Garrett, and Ethel Fee.

Thirteenth Census of the United States: 1910, Kentucky, Jackson County, Magisterial District #3, Supervisor’s District #11, Enumeration District #94, Sheet #6, Line #72-80 (28-29 April 1910)

Instead of daughter-in-law and grandchildren, Louisa and children are listed as nieces and nephews. Just to double verify, were they the children of one of Sarah sisters who married a Fee (or Hensley)? Mapping out Sarah’s siblings shows no Fee’s or Hensley’s. Are they the children of Henderson’s siblings? No, except Hiram Jones Fee.

What if the 1880 census is incorrect? What if Hiram was living with Henderson and Sarah, and although he’s listed as a son, he really isn’t their son? Is there a family situation that justifies this conclusion?

There may be.

HJF’s father Hiram had been previously married to Sarah Jane Daniels and had a son, John who was born in 1867. Later, Hiram married Joyce Howard on 02 October 1871. Together they had Granville (born 1871), Sarah (born 1874), Mary Jane (born 1876), David (born 1879), and Boyd (born 1881).

What if a pregnant Joyce was too busy to care for HJF with 3-year-old Granville, 2-year-old Sarah, and Mary Jane on the way? What if HJF was placed in his uncle Henderson’s home, especially when considering that Henderson and Sarah were married on 21 April 1861, and having no children in the fourteen years since, welcomed HJF as their own?

There may be another family situation. The “Rebecca Jones” from Hiram Jones Fee’s death certificate may be Rebecca Wells (1845-1924), the daughter of Clayborn Wells and Rebecca Midgett formerly of Tennessee who moved to Kentucky. With the birth of David Fee in 1879 and Boyd in 1881 (with evidence to suggest they were Joyce’s children), Hiram was still married, and therefore didn’t remarry to Rebecca. With no marriage license, was Hiram considered an illegitimate child and all of the stigma that it carried in 1875?

What if at the age of thirty, Rebecca did not want to raise Hiram? Did having a child hinder her chances of getting married now that she was in her thirties? What if Joyce refused to raise a child that wasn’t her son, especially due to her husband’s infidelity? With Hiram Jones Fee’s birth date of 16 February 1875, he would have been six months old when Rebecca married Marion Alexander Jones on 16 August 1875. What if Marion refused to raise Hiram because he wasn’t his son?

So which is correct… the 1880 census or the 1910 census? If you can answer the “what if” questions with a degree of certainty, the leap of faith conclusion is that Hiram Jones Fee must have been Henderson’s nephew.

Going back to Step #1 thru Step #7 for both Louisa Hensley, Sallie Farmer, and Susan Alice Reed, our tree now looks like this.

Click here to see how the family tree is starting to look.

Next blog:  the final step and conclusion.

Philip Farmer is the author and publisher of “Edward Farmar and the Sons of Whitemarsh,” a 500-page, 155-year biographical history of Stephen Farmer’s family immigration from Ireland into Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Virginia, Tennessee, and Harlan County, Kentucky. Complete with bibliography and footnotes that supports the research. Check out LuLu’s current discounts which may save you money than purchasing through Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Walmart, or other retailers.

Click me for more info

“Very well written and researched…” Ms. L. King

“I love your work… Very interesting!” Ms. B. H. Baker

“Amazing research!” Ms. J. Shipley

“Wonderfully researched, well written… recommend it even if you’re not related to the Farmar’s…” Mr. D. Roark

“Excellent book! We highly recommend!” Ms. E. Wolf

“Very informative and interesting. I could not put it down.” Ms. E. Farley

Part 3: Hiram Fee

A tutorial on deductive reason when branching your family tree using Hiram Fee as the example.

Assuming you have been following this blog series on determining if your person of interest belongs in your family tree, we’ll skip the introductions and move on to the next step. If you haven’t been following along, recommend you read Part 1 and Part 2.


Obituary of Hiram Jones Fee.
Source: Jackson County Banner, IN (31 May 1950), p.2.

By this point you have now amassed a large number of documents on your person of interest and possible associates such as their parents, spouses, children, siblings, cousins, aunts, uncles, and grandparents. Time to move on to Step #5:

STEP #5:  APPLY THE EASY PROBABILITIES TO YOUR POSSIBILITIES.

Wait, what? Aren’t they the same?

No. Possibility means something may happen. Probability applies a belief to that possibility, typically based on increasing amounts of credible evidence. For example, it is possible it may rain today. If you don’t see any clouds, the probability that it may rain is low. If you see dark clouds and lightning in the distance, the probability increases. Another example:  it is possible that aliens exist. The probability that aliens exist is, well, dependent on what evidence you want to believe.

Essentially, you’re “playing the odds.” If you come across five documents that all have the same information, the odds are great and you have high probability that the information among the documents correlate. In most cases, a record with ever-increasing data provides even higher probabilities. For example, if you find a will with a name, what’s the probability that it is the will of your person of interest? What if we add a location? What if we start adding a spouse’s name? Then start adding children? And what if the will was dated near the suspected death date?

Be wary of user-submitted data such as anything from Family Data Collection, other family trees, and even Find A Grave. As they are resources and not sources, they do not increase probability; they simply provide additional possibilities.

To really apply probabilities, it helps to have some knowledge of local history, whether it be city, county, state, country, or other locale, and to have some family history, whether it be true or false. For example, in an earlier blog trying to locate the father of Lucinda Baker, taking that extra leap of faith that Samuel Chase Early was her father was in the fact that he ran for sheriff of Knox County… family history was that Lucinda’s husband John Linville was sheriff (which turned out to be false.)

In genealogy, you may see language like “probably,” or “may have,” or “it is believed,” or other verbiage that makes an argument with the data provided. That is because in some cases, you have to make an educated guess. However, there does become a point where you can’t keep throwing “what if’s” at the problem. Occam’s Razor in problem solving states that “simpler solutions are more likely to be correct than complex solutions.” Or as the US Navy noted in 1960, “keep it simple, stupid.”

Remember the 1880 federal census where Hiram is enumerated as the 5-year-old son of Henderson Fee (age 41) and Sarah (age 30). Henderson’s age matches our known birth date of 1839; Sarah’s age of 30 is five years lower than our expected age of 35. So what do you believe? Sarah “probably” 1) lied about her age, or 2) didn’t know her age, or 3) really wasn’t born in 1845.

The 1880 census shows she cannot read and she cannot write, whereas Henderson can. Sarah’s death certificate, with information provided by Henderson, has her birth year as 1845. Her age on prior 1850, 1860, and 1870 censuses all suggest she was born in 1845. It is probable that Sarah didn’t know her age; maybe the census guy came around when Henderson was away? It is also probable that Sarah lied about her age; a socially acceptable trait, particularly with women who want to remain young. But what if it isn’t Sarah Osborne, which is to say, Ms. Osborne passed away and Henderson remarried another Sarah? What if aliens abducted her and replaced her? Ok, now we’re getting silly, but you see where too many “what if’s” can be detrimental to solving the problem.

Also, sometimes no data is data. What do I mean by that? No other census could be found for a Henderson and Sarah Fee; therefore, the probability is high that the 1800 census is of our target couple. Be prepared to lower your probabilities if/when another record surfaces… this is where most people start getting into forum arguments because they’ve held onto their beliefs with what records they’ve located.

In addition to Step #4 with looking at other family trees, obituaries and media articles are my go-to for genealogical problem solving. If you read the obituary of John who has a wife Mary and sons Jim, Jack, and Jose, then read the obituary of Mary who had a late husband John and sons Jim, John, Jack, and Jose, then read an obituary of Jim who was the son of John and Mary and survived by brothers Jack and Jose, then… well, you get the picture. Did you notice one obituary included a son John, whereas the others didn’t? I have solved more brick walls in obituaries and media articles than any other source.

Obituaries provide birth dates, death dates, residence, parents, spouses, siblings, extended family, occupation, and other information, that when paired with other records, increases the probabilities that the record(s) match your person of interest. Again, no data is data. No sibling listed in the obituary? They probably died before their sibling did. Or they were a step-sibling. Or they moved away and nobody knows their status. Or someone just plain forgot in their remorse. Or purposely omitted them due to the fight they had during the last Thanksgiving dinner. Or they were abducted by aliens.

Using the sample of records and obituaries collected from Step #4, we start branching the family tree of Hiram Fee.

Click here for the sample records collected.

Click here to see how the sample records start to branch out the family tree.

Note that so far, we’ve only used death certificates, obituaries, and one marriage record.

The very observant cynic will notice that this is just an incomplete tree about a “Hiram Jones Fee.” But is it the son of Henderson and Sarah? To finish this family tree, we’ll need to get religious and hurdle a few problems.

Coming up in Part 4 of this blog series, taking the leap of faith…

Philip Farmer is the author and publisher of “Edward Farmar and the Sons of Whitemarsh,” a 500-page, 155-year biographical history of Stephen Farmer’s family immigration from Ireland into Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Virginia, Tennessee, and Harlan County, Kentucky. Complete with bibliography and footnotes that supports the research. Check out LuLu’s current discounts which may save you money than purchasing through Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Walmart, or other retailers.

Click me for more info

“Very well written and researched…” Ms. L. King

“I love your work… Very interesting!” Ms. B. H. Baker

“Amazing research!” Ms. J. Shipley

“Wonderfully researched, well written… recommend it even if you’re not related to the Farmar’s…” Mr. D. Roark

“Excellent book! We highly recommend!” Ms. E. Wolf

“Very informative and interesting. I could not put it down.” Ms. E. Farley