In this multi-part blog series, we examine “Hiram Fee” to educate genealogical research and deduction methods.
Several weeks ago, I was on the telephone with a gentleman who had questions regarding the westward expansion from Grayson County, Virginia into Kentucky. Amidst the explanations of King George’s Royal Proclamation of 1763, Richard Henderson’s Transylvania Company, and Daniel Boone’s development of the Wilderness Trail through the Cumberland Gap, he made an inquisitive statement.
“How do people know that the person they’ve added into their tree is really the person that should be in their tree?”
Good question.
Assume I introduce myself as Phil when you and I meet on a busy street. You would most likely accept my introduction. But how do you really know my name is Phil? You could ask for my drivers license. But how do you know the license is mine? How do you know the information on the license is correct? You could ask for my birth certificate and verify my age. You could even ask for my utility bill and verify my address.
Quite simply, given the circumstances in how the information is presented, you’ll accept a level of data on faith. We live in a time where identification cards are issued with additional checks and balances. We accept a drivers license has the correct and necessary information, even if we lied a little on our height and weight, which does not require proof. And faith only goes so far. If you were a store clerk and I was to write you a check, you’d need some additional documents to believe that the check was from my bank account. If you were a coroner in the absence of verbal statements or written documents, you might verify my dental records or DNA.
What you have then is a system of people defending their faith or belief with the available information. I believe you are who you say you are because you told me. Or because you have some form of identification. Or because the science proves it. And yes, even with increasing levels of data, some people will continue to question its validity, or refuse to accept data contrary to their belief.
The same is true for genealogy. It is a system where you assess historical documents, examine DNA markers, take a leap of faith, and occasionally challenge assumptions. And regrettably, get involved in an argument as to who is “more correct.”
So there have been a few blogs regarding cautionary advice on “user submitted data” and today’s “click and save” software which makes it easy to build your family tree, or makes it just as easy to screw it up. One blog cautioned that even with “leafy hints” you may still have to do some hard work to find the family connections. The blog on Enos “Bear” Hensley was an example of how you might have to really sort out the information at hand. There is a lot of online advice against copying another person’s tree.
One common issue you may face is what to do when confronted with multiple people with the same name living in the same vicinity at the same time. For example, there are about six Gary Farmer’s living in Battle Creek, Michigan. One is my father; we have no idea who the other five are and have never met them, yet we are constantly asked if we are related. For those researching the Osborne, Skidmore, or any family surname where each of the branches names their children after the patriarch, you know the struggle. For anyone researching a John Smith, we definitely feel your pain.
This is probably more evident when reading forums or looking at family trees in which aspects of multiple people are presented as one. For example, assume there is a John Doe (1811-1879) married to Susan, and a John Doe (1816-1867) married to Rachel. Just with two different birth dates, two different death dates, and two different spouses, if you confused the two, then there are now eight different combinations of John Doe’s with a John Doe (1811-1867) married to Rachel, a John Doe (1816-1879) married to Susan, and so on.
One such name is “Hiram Fee” and using him as an example, this blog is part one in a series that continues the education on genealogical research and deduction methods.
I first came across a “Hiram Fee” when researching Stephen Farmer’s daughter, Malinda Farmer (1817-1900). Malinda married Enoch Osborne (1811-1860) on 04 November 1834 and together they had a daughter, Sarah J. Osborne (1845-1916). Sarah married Henderson Fee (1839-1918), the son of John Fee and Jane Lee.
The 1870 United States Federal Census shows Henderson and his wife Sarah. Ten years later, the 1880 United States Federal Census shows Henderson with his wife Sarah and a son Hiram, age four. The 1900 United States Federal Census shows Henderson, Sarah, and mother-in-law “Belinda Thompson,” presumably Malinda (Farmer) Osborne who appears to have remarried after her husband Enoch died in 1860.
After adding Hiram as Henderson and Sarah’s son, no leafy hint appeared. So I started a records search. Yet after searching, I had no other document that added a name to what I knew. For example, no death certificate could be found that had Hiram, Henderson, and Sarah’s names, or a marriage document with their names and Hiram’s wife. A Kentucky County Marriage Record has a Hiram Fee marrying a Sallie Farmer on 08 March 1907. But which Hiram Fee? Which Sallie Farmer?
It appeared there may be several Hiram Fee’s in Harlan County at about the same time.
So what do you now?
STEP #1: STOP WITH WHAT YOU KNOW.
If you start attaching a lot of documents and you don’t document how you came to your conclusions, you’d be painstakingly deconstructing your tree if your assumption was incorrect and learning the importance to document, document, document, then verify, verify, verify.
STEP #2: EXPAND THE FAMILY BRANCHES.
When dealing with multiple names in a family surname, you may need to go beyond a direct ancestor or descendent. I will admit that when I first started, I didn’t add much information on the spouses’ branches. This is partly because the amount of work would become overwhelming on family members that were not direct descendants, and partially because I didn’t need the constant reminder or spam that I had 1,834,273 hints on those ancestors. If you also adopted that approach, note that from time-to-time, you may need to research the spouse family branches, especially when two or more intermarry into the same family (e.g. Mr. X marries Ms. Y whose brother Mr. Y marries Mr. X’s sister.)
Thus began a process of elimination in branching all of the second, third, and fourth cousins to determine if more than one Hiram Fee was living in the same vicinity at the same time.
[Note: This blog edited from an earlier version. The family tree had the spouse of Jane Lee as John Gregg Fee in error.]
Philip Farmer is the author and publisher of “Edward Farmar and the Sons of Whitemarsh,” a 500-page, 155-year biographical history of the Farmer family’s immigration from Ireland into Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Virginia, Tennessee, and Harlan County, Kentucky. Complete with bibliography and footnotes that supports the research. Check out LuLu’s current discounts which may save you money than purchasing through Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Walmart, or other retailers.
“Very well written and researched…” Ms. L. King
“I love your work… Very interesting!” Ms. B. H. Baker
“Amazing research!” Ms. J. Shipley
“Wonderfully researched, well written… recommend it even if you’re not related to the Farmar’s…” Mr. D. Roark
“Excellent book! We highly recommend!” Ms. E. Wolf
“Very informative and interesting. I could not put it down.” Ms. E. Farley